On a motion for summary judgment, it is well-settled that the movant must make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, tendering sufficient evidence to demonstrate the absence of any material issues of fact. If the movant fails to make such a showing, then the motion must be denied, regardless of the sufficiency of the opposing papers. Once a showing has been made, the burden shifts to the party opposing the motion to produce evidentiary proof in admissible form sufficient to establish the existence of material issues of fact which require a trial of the action. See Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]; SRM Card Shop v. 1740 Broadway Associates, 2 AD3d 136 [1 Dept. 2003]; Romano v. St. Vincent’s Medical Center of Richmond, 178 AD2d 467 [2 Dept. 1991].
Super Lawyers: Richard A. Klass has been selected for the New York Metro Super Lawyers List every year since 2015.
Recent Blog Posts
- 13,166 Views
- Super Lawyers: 10th year for Richard Klass
- Dismissed legal malpractice action based on jurisdictional grounds
- The court reminded parties of the importance of submitting affidavits on motions
- An allegation of attorney deceit on the court or a party
- In New York, violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct, do not, absent more, provide a basis for a legal malpractice claim
Attorney Advertising
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Thank you for visiting the website of Richard A. Klass, Esq. Please note that by visiting my/our website or communicating with any member of staff, an attorney-client relationship is not created. We will be pleased to speak with you to determine if we are able to assist you and provide competent legal representation. None of the information provided on the website should be considered legal advice.
We are a Debt Relief Agency. We help people file for bankruptcy relief under the Bankruptcy Code.
Website copyr. 1999-2024 Richard A. Klass
Digital marketing: The Innovation Works, Inc.